On a Monday night that brimmed with passion and civic engagement, the Waterloo city council resoundingly passed a conversion therapy ban, leaving an indelible mark on the fight for LGBTQ+ rights. By a vote of 6-1 on all three readings, the council firmly declared its stance against the abhorrent practice that seeks to alter an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity through cruel and discredited methods. This momentous decision was spurred by the voices of numerous Waterloo citizens who passionately expressed their opinions. Councilman Jonathan Grieder, who spearheaded the ordinance, aptly described conversion therapy as a discredited and barbaric practice. However, opponents of the ban have voiced concerns about its perceived restrictiveness, prompting a broader discussion on the topic. Sam Caughron, a student from the University of Northern Iowa, eloquently shed light on the problems associated with conversion therapy, highlighting the alarming use of techniques such as electroshock therapy and even baptism-like rituals to force individuals to abandon their true selves. One concerned citizen, John Harnell, expressed his worries about the vagueness of the ordinance, fearing that even innocuous questions or expressions of doubt might be misconstrued. He remarked, "If somebody even thinks of asking a child 'are you sure?' they can report me." These concerns demonstrate the delicate balance that must be struck between protecting vulnerable individuals and ensuring freedom of speech and open dialogue. In response to these concerns, Waterloo Mayor Quentin Hart provided clarity on the process for lodging complaints in cases where someone believes they have been subjected to conversion therapy. Mayor Hart emphasized that individuals have avenues to report incidents to the city attorney and the Human Rights Executive Director. If a complaint is validated, the Human Rights Commission will escalate the matter by sending a letter to the State Licensing Board, ensuring that appropriate authorities are made aware of the alleged transgressions. Although Waterloo lacks the jurisdiction to unilaterally ban conversion therapy, this landmark decision empowers the city to facilitate complaints from those who have endured this harmful practice and guide them towards the proper channels of recourse. By standing firmly against conversion therapy, Waterloo sets a powerful example for other communities, fostering a culture of acceptance, support, and protection for LGBTQ+ individuals. The passing of the conversion therapy ban in Waterloo signifies a resounding victory for human rights and marks a critical step forward in the ongoing battle against discrimination. It is a testament to the power of passionate voices and collective action, reminding us that change is possible when communities unite in pursuit of justice and equality.